Sweet + Sharp

Posts Tagged: WWE

WrestleMania 29 Reviewed!

You could tell Vince wanted to let the guys on the card sell WrestleMania this year, rather than celebrities and spectacle. Sure, The Rock is one of the biggest movie stars in the world, but he wasn’t presented as a special attraction this year, he was just a part of the show. Brock Lesnar is one of the biggest athletes in the world, but he wasn’t presented as “UFC Champion Brock Lesnar” like he was at Extreme Rules, he was just “Brock Lesnar: Jimmy John’s enthusiast.” This method of presentation perhaps didn’t work as well as it could have - presenting a straight wrestling show for a die-hard wrestling crowd seemed like a good idea - but it wasn’t a bad show. It was a weird one during a weird moment in the WWE canon…

 

Full review in the link.

An oral history of Undertaker, Kane & Paul Bearer

I spent five hours today reciting the mythos of The Dark Side from memory. Enjoy.

Text

The Top Matches in WrestleMania History has been a yearly feature since I launched Kick-Out!! back in 2009. Instead of posting a two-part list this year, I figured I’d post a match everyday leading up to the big day on April 7. Unfortunately, I forgot to start it on Saturday, which was exactly 29 days til WrestleMania 29. So today, you get three matches. Here we go!


29. Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels - WrestleMania XII
A lot of people have soured on this match over the years, probably due to the overwhelming amount of praise that was heaped onto it soon after it happened, but it’s still a damn good match. I wouldn’t put it in either man’s top 25 matches of all-time, but that’s just how good they both were; a decent Shawn Michaels/Bret Hart match is still one of the best WrestleMania matches in history. Love it or hate it, they wrestled for 62 minutes… I’m exhausted after typing for 62 minutes.

28. Triple H vs. The Undertaker - WrestleMania XXVIII
This is definitely a love it or hate it match, perhaps hurt a bit by the instant reaction culture of internet commentary, but I think it will stand the test of time and be looked back on fondly in a few years. You could argue that these two were just too broken down, but for the years leading up to this climactic battle, I’ve looked at it as a Clash of the Titans style battle where everything these guys did to each other was just brutal. Obviously it didn’t have the story, the atmosphere and the culture of a Hogan vs. Andre, but in terms of working within their limitations and making it feel like they were killing each other, it felt somewhat similar. Their match the year before seems more divisive than this one, the addition of Hell in a Cell and Shawn Michaels being incredibly effective as the referee seemed to silence most (but not all) of the critics.



27. The Big Show vs. Floyd “Money” Mayweather - WrestleMania XXIV
Is it a “good” match, in what your typical, overly-analytical wrestling fan would describe? No, you probably won’t be seeing anything like this on people who like their wrasslin’ to be “wrestling,” but if you ever want to watch something that exemplifies what American pro wrestling is, watch this match.

Wrestling has an iffy history with celebrity involvement - sometimes it works, and sometimes you have a disaster like Jay Leno beating up Hulk Hogan. WWE executed this crossover with perfection and the match did what it was supposed to do: it received loads of mainstream attention, entertained those watching and kept The Big Show looking strong even though he lost to a guy that’s more than a foot shorter and 300 lbs. lighter. All for the low cost of $20 million to “Pretty Boy” Floyd. WWE hasn’t been as quick to put a celebrity in an actual wrestling match at WrestleMania since (unless you count The Rock), and I think it’s because this one is too tough to top.

Check back tomorrow for match #26.

Wrestling advice from Fall Out Boy

I like a lot of things. My tastes are very random, from horror movies to Disney films, pro wrestling and politics, my iPod (actually, it’s an S3 now) has Social Distortion and Kelly Clarkson on it. I have far too many hobbies including comics, video games, collecting vinyl and building a big movie library, and the older I get, the more I realize I’m just too busy to actively hate art that doesn’t fit my particular tastes. Don’t get me wrong, I still find time to complain (it’s the best!), but I’ve never hopped on the “OMG JUSTIN BIEBER IS THE WORST!” or “TWILIGHT SUX BALLZ!” trains because I just don’t care enough to even know what those things are. I’m not going to waste the time that could be spent watching a horror movie or playing through my back catalog of video games on complaining about sparkly vampires. 

It’s why there was such a dry spell on the blog in the last year, I just didn’t care enough to write or podcast about something that wasn’t fun. WWE wasn’t entertaining me, so I turned it off. Now, while there are things that still bug me about the show (and always will), I’m excited for WrestleMania and excited to write about WWE again.

Patrick Stump, lead singer of Fall Out Boy, wrote a really great piece this week on the “Culture of Hate” and its impact on our culture. 

Now, I’m not saying I like [Nickelback and Dane Cook]. Like you (fellow pop culture spectator) I am honor-bound by the unspoken law that, no matter what, I am not allowed to say anything positive about these artists. What have they really done wrong? Have they offended me? Not really… Yet for some reason, here I am crippled by a vague and probably unwarranted desire not to appear to be a fan of Nickelback and Dane Cook.

That’s sad. In this generation of blazing wi-fi and scathing tweets, I think it’s very easy to lose sight of anyone else’s opinion. We’re so busy broadcasting our latest cultural disdain that we scantly notice anything we enjoy. “Oh man, this Rebecca Black kid is terrible! Let’s laugh at her!” has become more culturally relevant than “I really love this new Bilal record.” I read an entire article examining why we as a society don’t like Anne Hathaway’s (in my unnecessary opinion, lovely) face. Well, criticizing art and the artists that make it is a lazier pass time than creating or appreciating it. 


Now, in my younger days, I was one of those people loudly hating on Nickelback (their music is terrible, but not gonna lie, they put on a hell of a live show), but as Stump explains, wouldn’t that energy be better suited celebrating the things we like?

There’s this culture now of “hate-watching” television shows, NBC’s Smash was notorious for it, I’ve also heard people hate-watching WCW, TNA, even WWE… why? From the few episodes I’ve seen, I downright loathe The Big Bang Theory, so I just don’t watch it. TNA hasn’t entertained me since, well, ever, so that’s why I don’t watch it anymore. That’s not to say these things don’t deserve critique or even outright negativity, but to actively devote your precious time to something that makes you angry? 

Ever seen the movie Private Parts with Howard Stern? I’m reminded of the scene where Pig Vomit finds out that Howard Stern haters listened to his show longer than Howard Stern fans, that can’t be healthy. Or, you’re secretly a fan of these things you claim to hate and “hate-watch” to appear cool while watching/listening/etc. Yes, I’m saying if you’re an active Bieber hater, you’re probably jamming to “Baby, baby, baby” when no one’s around.

The only exception to this rule is Randy Orton… OMG he’s the sux.

Best in the Netherworld!

The Undertaker vs. CM Punk. The Streak vs. The Really Long Title Reign.

Oddly, I’ve been seeing a lot of whining about this match. I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised, it’s the internet, it’s what it’s there for, but what exactly is the problem, there’s no story? Who cares? It’s CM Punk vs. The Undertaker. There, I sold the the match for you.

I’ve seen others throw out the idea that five weeks isn’t enough time to build the match and it needs a larger arbitrary number behind it, as if six or seven weeks would somehow put the match higher on the marquee. Again, it’s CM Punk vs. The Undertaker, what more do you need? 

“Aw man, this porno has no story.” It’s two people fucking on camera, what more do you need?!

The Fatal 4-Way on Monday’s Raw (not the one in the porn I just referenced) was already too much story for this match, it didn’t need Orton, Sheamus and Show getting involved. Just have Punk come out and say, “Oh I don’t get to defend my title at WrestleMania, so I’ll do you one better, I’ll beat The Streak.” Boom, done. That’s not to say Punk and Taker can’t exchange words or be framed just perfectly in the WrestleMania sign between now and April 7, but this isn’t the next season of Justified, folks. We don’t need a bunch of twists, turns, back-stabbings and shenanigans to sell something that sells itself: CM Punk vs. The Undertaker.

My only reservation is the two didn’t exactly set the world on fire when they met a couple times in 2009, but Taker was working hurt (more so than usual) and Punk was still finding his footing as a top tier guy, so I don’t think it’s a fair comparison. Now we’re talking about the Best in the World standing across the ring from The Goddamn Undertaker… atWrestleMania. Smirk if you want, but that means something and I imagine it means a lot to the two guys who will be in said ring, so I expect a much different match than what we saw at Breaking Point (lol) 2009.

I know a lot of people are bummed that CM Punk had to drop his title to an ACTOR and see this as some sort of consolation prize, but at this point, losing to The Undertaker at WrestleMania is a bigger deal than winning the WWE Title match. That’s not to belittle the WWE Championship - although it has been relegated to the best supporting actor category in recent years, and when it’s not, the match turns out disappointing - but The Streak is bigger than any belt. You might not think that’s a good thing, but it is the reality of the situation. I’m not sure when you would pinpoint the moment The Streak became a thing, I think they reference it as far back as WrestleMania 11, but I’d say WrestleMania 14 or 17 is when you look back and say, “okay, this is something special.” Sure, there have been duds along the way, (“just wait back here, Nathan Jones”), but since his return as The Deadman, the Streak match has become a major deal (and WM22 is criminally underrated). 

And the clock is ticking on it. There are going to be WrestleMania main events as long as there’s a WWE, but how many more Undertaker matches are we going to see? I’d be genuinely shocked if WrestleMania 30 wasn’t the last go around, so why wouldn’t a CM Punk fan want to see him in perhaps the penultimate Undertaker match? 

“Oh but you know he’s going to lose.” So? You knew Shawn Michaels and Triple H were going to lose over the last four years too, didn’t make the matches any less amazing or dramatic. And out of the WWE roster, CM Punk is the only guy besides John Cena who is even conceivably in the realm of possibly ending The Streak. If you want a believable match, Punk’s your only option this year, and I personally guarantee at least one moment that gives you heart palpitations. 

Sometimes we wrestling fans tend to over-think things and worrying about this match (and going into great detail explaining why that’s silly) is a good example. Let yourself have fun once in awhile; sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and sometimes it’s just CM Punk vs. The Goddamn Undertaker.

Text

It’s not every year, but it’s not unusual for WrestleMania to have a theme: WrestleMania 23 was “All Grown Up,” In 2005, WrestleMania went “Hollywood,” and WrestleMania 14 was “X-Raided” as we entered the Attitude Era. These themes usually go with a cute series of vignettes or something to signal a shift in presentation, but rarely do they influence the actual matches. WrestleMania 29’s matches, however, seem to have a theme of their own: redemption.

We heard John Cena talk about it Monday night on Raw, he insists that since losing to The Rock, he’s had the worst year of his life. We can argue the merits of that since he continued to be the focal point of the company, but I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt, Michael Jordan was still the face of basketball even if he didn’t win a championship that year, but the notion is that losing to The Rock has prevented him from cementing his legacy as the greatest WWE Superstar in history. The Rock doesn’t really have anything to prove against Cena, he beat him decisively last year and ended the 434-day title reign of the guy who had Cena’s number, but Cena needs it. If Cena doesn’t win this time, that’s it, he’s done it all, except this, it becomes a massive asterisk on the career that defined the last decade.

CM Punk is looking for redemption for losing the WWE Championship after a historic reign. He (rightfully) believes was screwed out of the title on two occasions by the current champion, who only won after some serious shenanigans in their current matches. But since John Cena put the kibosh on him getting into the main event of WrestleMania, he’ll do you one better and end your “precious streak.” Sure, winning the WWE Title match at WrestleMania can make you a legend, but ending The Undertaker’s streak? That makes you a god. WrestleMania is “The Showcase of the Immortals,” and if CM Punk can accomplish the impossible, his legendary title reign would only be a footnote on his already impressive record.

Triple H’s quest for redemption goes all the way back to July of 2011 when he was named the COO of WWE and his complete failure to properly run Monday Night Raw. His leadership (or lack thereof) caused the show to devolve to utter chaos, allowing for the installation of John Laurinaitis as General Manager, who gave into the ridiculous demands of the certifiable Brock Lesnar. Lesnar’s been seen sporadically in the last year, but when he makes an appearance, someone gets hurt and every drop of this blood is on Triple H’s hands. He could not keep this beast contained in April of 2012 and when he tried to get rid of him the old fashioned way at SummerSlam, he got his arm broken. It’s no secret Triple H’s career as a wrestler is in its twilight and his career as an executive got off on the wrong foot, so in order to end one chapter of his legacy and properly begin the next, he has to slay this dragon once and for all.

Not every Superstar will get his redemption come April 7, but these are the biggest names in the industry in some of the biggest matches of their careers on the biggest stage in all of wrestling. Streaks may end, careers may end, legacies may end, but each match is bound by a common thread, and before a single punch is even thrown, it’s something we can say we’ve never seen before.

WWE Raw - Feb 25, 2013

I’d appreciate it if you read my Raw review. 

Alex Jones thinks wrestling is real and 9/11 is fake

I hesitate to give any sort of attention to a feces-flinger like Alex Jones, noted 9/11 Truther and libertarian loudmouth. At best, he’s a deeply disturbed individual in need of serious psychiatric help, at worst, he’s a charlatan playing a character in order to con rednecks out of their money… kinda like a wrestling promoter!

If you haven’t heard of Jones, surely you saw his rant on Piers Morgan last month where he said Americans need to be heavily armed for the coming war with the United States military, which I imagine would go down a lot like last night’s match between Mark Henry and Sin Cara. 

Now, don’t get me wrong, screaming at Piers Morgan is good, clean fun for the whole family, but I think we can all agree Jones is an asshole. Anyhoo, he’s not thrilled with WWE’s new Tea Party character, Zeb Colter, he had this to say today.

This is part of the divide and conquer tactic of cultural subversion to manufacture racial division and to characterize the Tea Party, conservatives, libertarians, opponents of uncontrolled illegal immigration and constitutionalists as racist, extremist radicals who should be pushed to the fringes of the political discourse.

Now the demonization runs so deep that it’s even being bolstered by WWE wrestling.

The fact that WWE is owned by Vince and Linda McMahon, who are part of the Republican establishment, also tells us a lot about how grass roots conservatives and libertarians are viewed by those near the top of the power structure.

Why are we getting so wound up about a wrestling gimmick? WWE programming reaches 14 million Americans every week – and millions more worldwide. To put it in context – that’s more than 10 times the amount of viewers who watch America’s top rated news show, The O’Reilly Factor
.


10 times the amount of viewers that watch Bill O’Reilly? Maybe there’s hope for America yet.

And a huge “LOL!” to Vince and Linda McMahon being “near the top of the Republican power structure.” Yes, the Linda McMahon who spent $100 million to lose two bids for the US Senate and the Vince McMahon who was indicted by the federal government. They’re just a heartbeat away from global domination!

Now, I don’t agree with Vince & Linda’s politics at all, but they are what the Republican Party has traditionally stood for: give me your money. The problem with this isn’t that they’re a couple “establishment types” making fun of the Tea Party in a fake wrestling story… the problem is, in the real world, the Tea Party has pushed the establishment to the fringe. You can’t be a part of the Republican Party anymore if you don’t subscribe to their extreme brand of politics: anti-immigrant, anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-government, anti-science, anti-shower, etc. In today’s America, Vince & Linda are more toxic than they usually are, they’re not just smut-peddlers, they’re smut-peddlers who also dress nice and speak in complete sentences. 

If you ever want to piss off a racist, hold a mirror up to their racism, which WWE is doing here. WWE has a huge Latino fanbase… also a huge European fanbase, Australian fanbase, Asian fanbase, Arabic fanbase, etc. etc. etc. and their history of racist storylines and characters has always struck me odd considering this fact. But that’s changing; today, their World Heavyweight Champion is a proud Mexican who doesn’t hide his heritage, but it’s also not his only defining characteristic. Alberto Del Rio is a great wrestler who also happens to be Mexican, he’s also a great friend, very stylish and a bit of a joker. That’s a very welcome change from having a Mexican wrestler drive to the ring on a lawnmower. 

So in this progress (which, admittedly, is entirely financially-driven), WWE is capitalizing on the current immigration fight by presenting a strong Mexican role model against a batshit crazy white racist. This is new(ish) territory for wrestling, usually the shoe is on the foot with the strong white hero conquering the evil foreigner, and much like the shifting dynamics of real-world America, racists are becoming increasingly uncomfortable with this change, which makes them increasingly louder. 

Alex Jones and the paranoid doomsday preppers that he panders to are dying off. And in a last ditch effort to preserve their idyllic 1950s America, are willing to wear their hate right on their sleeves in an almost cartoonish fashion. What better place to see it play out than in the cartoon world of professional wrestling?

Raw review - 2/11/13

Nashville is a pretty kick-ass crowd. 

Raw review

Read it.

Monday Night Raw - January 28, 2013

More at the link:

I realize Raw generally has a 15 minute overrun and PPVs never go the full three hours, but these three hour Raws feel like I’m watching two PPVs back-to-back. The commercials don’t help, especially since WWE has had the same six sponsors since 1989, “it looks so natural, no one can tell, with Just For Men gel!” Even when the show is solid, like last night’s was, there’s just so much pointless bullshit. In the 90s, at the height of the Attitude Era, Vince McMahon himself once said the ideal time for a wrestling show was 90 minutes. At what WWE and many fans consider their creative peak (this fan excluded), Vince thought the show should be half the length it is now. This format has provided us with longer matches, which is nice, but there’s still so much nothing going on, more on that presently…

So much for my happy ending

“Maybe it’s okay to be pissed when your guy loses or the guy you hate wins, that can be healthy. When it becomes ridiculous is when you allow that anger to overshadow a great show, like what’s happening with last night’s Rumble. It was a fantastic PPV, two solid opening matches, one of the best Rumbles in years and an awesome main event, don’t let the fact that the story didn’t cater to your specific tastes ruin what was a fun three-hour journey.”

WWE Royal Rumble 2013

I am not upset about Punk losing the belt, his record is set in stone and it’s possible it will never be duplicated, but I’m not surprised the Twittersphere does not agree with the decision. I’m already hearing the usual gripes that Cena doesn’t “need” the title, Rock vs. Cena doesn’t “need” to be for the belt, let guys who “need” it fight for the belt, etc.

I’m sorry, but the notion of someone not needing a title makes said title useless. That’s part of the problem with everyone else being a rung below the Cenas and Rocks of the world, them not “needing” the titles, makes the titles beneath them. If Rock and Cena II is the biggest match possible, then it needs to be for the belt, that elevates the title immensely, and eventually, the guy who beats one of them for it.

Raw 20 review

So I’ve kinda sorta relaunched my wrestling blog. Read my Raw review if you’d like. 

Bank Error

I haven’t watched a PPV since Extreme Rules and I had every intention of watching Money in the Bank, but I totally forgot last night was the season premiere of Breaking Bad. Sorry, WWE, you just can’t compete with Walter White’s final season.

It doesn’t sound like I missed much though, everything sounds perfectly acceptable, but there’s absolutely nothing here that sounds must-see like last year’s MITB. Last year we had Punk’s glorious character shift and the future of WWE hanging in the balance, Daniel Bryan’s shocking win in the Smackdown MITB and Del Rio fulfilling his destiny (again) on Raw.

While all of those things wound up being disappointing - I suppose you could make the case for Bryan, although I’d say he became way more interesting when he lost the title - it made for a fantastic PPV. Here we get Ziggler fulfilling his destiny (again, again, again, again, again), Punk staying on top and Cena winning the briefcase. There’s nothing wrong with Ziggler winning MITB, he’s certainly earned it and should make a great foil for Sheamus and there’s nothing wrong with Punk staying on top, just 41 more days and he’ll have the longest non-Cena reign since Diesel, but there’s no buzz like there was last year. Can’t buzz all the time, I suppose.

But Cena winning the briefcase is massively stupid. I like Cena, I’ve never seriously used the phrase “Super Cena” in my life, and I’m more than okay with him reentering the title picture after almost a year out of it. But the MITB briefcase? Dumb. And pointless. And dumb. 

The only cool thing that will come out of Cena’s time as Mr. Money in the Bank is that we’ll most likely see it cashed in for a proper match. Cena’s not going to cash-in when someone’s at their most vulnerable, so we’ll probably see him pull an RVD at SummerSlam and give us a rematch of last year’s main event. But even that’s pointless, Cena doesn’t need a briefcase to make that happen, he could walk up to Punk tonight and say “hey man, let’s fight,” the match would be set and it would be totally acceptable.

The WWE Title MITB would’ve been better off with any other guy in that match… okay, except Kane, no one wants to see that. But Big Show’s doing some of the best work of his career, Jericho invented the concept and could have so much fun with it and The Miz could’ve got a MUCH needed boost after a year of decline.

My only thought on how this works is if The Rock does in fact win the WWE Championship.That would be interesting and The Rock would be the only person Cena would screw over if he was in a vulnerable position since they have this whole Borden vs. Angier rivalry going on anyway.

Still, all this would mean CM Punk has to lose the WWE Title, and I’m not ready for that to happen yet.